| Friday, November 20th, 2009 |
| 4:28 pm |
The State of Things
It's been a long time since I posted on financial crisis related matters. This is partially a function of the doom seeming far less impending for a while now ... but that brings me to the impetus for this post: Behold the dueling Friday NYT Op-eds by David Brooks and Paul Krugman. There's an interesting contrast between the two. You could argue that there are a wide variety of explanations for why two people can look at the same set of facts and draw very different conclusions. For my part, it seems to me to be a sort of glass-half-full vs. glass-half-empty situation. To sum them up: Brooks: Geithner managed to get us off the road to instant ruin. Yay! Krugman: Geithner managed to move us onto the road to eventual, unavoidable ruin. Boo! |
| Sunday, May 17th, 2009 |
| 6:29 pm |
|
| Tuesday, April 14th, 2009 |
| 11:32 pm |
October, November, January, February
Floyd Norris points out a fascinating maneuver by Goldman Sachs. Just change your fiscal year from starting in December to calendar year reporting, and make a whole month vanish. And jam pack that month with a wide variety of fascinating and unusual things that you would never want to be part on any quarter you are ever going to report on to your shareholders. Dirty pool. |
| Thursday, April 2nd, 2009 |
| 10:25 am |
|
| Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 |
| 10:05 am |
|
| Wednesday, March 25th, 2009 |
| 11:05 am |
Tilt the Field
File this under 'Sensible Strategies': According to DealBook, Citigroup and Bank of America are buying up mortgage-linked securities at (secondary?) market (or even above-market) prices as fast as they can get their hands on them right now. Could that be because they intend to sell them shortly through the government-subsidized auction process at a higher price? Makes sense to me. You can't fault them for being clever and reading the situation correctly. With the non-recourse loans the Government is using to sweeten those future deals, the price is bound to be higher. So what if announcing this strategy has had the unintended consequence of temporarily increasing the total amount of crap on the books of these two most balance sheet impaired megabanks (so they can later maximize their future benefit from the Gov's assistance). The important thing is that they're acting rationally, right? |
| Tuesday, March 24th, 2009 |
| 7:21 pm |
In Love, War ... and Finance?
This gem is from Steve Waldman's interfluidity blog, brought to my attention by Yves Smith's naked capitalism: ... I am filled with despair, not because what we are doing cannot "work", but because it is too unjust. This is not my country.
The news of today is the Geithner plan. I think this plan might work very well in terms of repairing bank balance sheets.
Of course the whole notion of repairing bank balance sheet is a lie and misdirection. The balance sheets we should want to see repaired are household balance sheets. Banks have failed us profoundly. We want them reorganized, not repaired. A world in which the banks are all fixed but households are still broken is worse than what we have right now. Too-big-to-fail banks restored to health are too-big-to-fail banks restored to power. The idea that fixing legacy banks is prerequisite to fixing the broad economy is a lie perpetrated by legacy bankers. |
| Monday, March 23rd, 2009 |
| 2:20 pm |
|
| Wednesday, March 11th, 2009 |
| 4:50 pm |
Learn to Swim
Here's a Nassim Taleb quote (via Krugman's blog, via an older Bloomberg piece) that I absolutely love: ``We refused to touch credit default swaps,'' Taleb said. ``It would be like buying insurance on the Titanic from someone on the Titanic.'' |
| Sunday, March 8th, 2009 |
| 12:41 am |
Shell Game
The relationships between the Federal Reserve, Maiden Lane LLC II & III (these are SPVs set up so the Fed can act as a lender), AIG, and their counterparties, are nothing less than fascinating. Josh Marshall, in this Talking Points Memo entry tells the story of how the money has been shuffled around, and how AIG 'really' managed to lose $61B in 4Q 2008. |
| Friday, March 6th, 2009 |
| 5:00 pm |
|
| Thursday, March 5th, 2009 |
| 7:27 pm |
Nero Plays an Encore
Here's a quote from Krugman's blog that pretty much sums up the glumness I'm feeling: The sickening feeling of drift — the sense that policymakers are refusing to face hard facts, and are dithering while the world economy burns — just keeps getting stronger. |
| 12:49 pm |
|
| Tuesday, February 17th, 2009 |
| 9:38 am |
|
| Tuesday, February 10th, 2009 |
| 12:20 am |
|
| Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 |
| 7:44 pm |
|
| Monday, January 5th, 2009 |
| 9:10 pm |
|
| 8:55 pm |
|
| Thursday, December 18th, 2008 |
| 7:28 pm |
|
| Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008 |
| 12:55 pm |
One Door Closes
Replace default with recovery, and you can have a new (yet oddly similar) ballgame. And so, a new class of unregulated instruments can be used to build a house of cards, and wreak havoc somewhere down the line. Instead of betting on the bankruptcy, bet instead on what the bondholders will get on the dollar once it happens. Sheesh. |